associative arrays with manual memory management
via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Tue Aug 25 23:50:25 PDT 2015
On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master
It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators. I'm
especially interested in how much speed we can gain with using a
non-shared BlockAllocator in combination with aammm.AA.
Can the whole AA be made `@safe pure nothrow` if the allocator is
stored inside the AA itself (non-shared)?
I'm especially interested in using this for keys and values only
with no indirections.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list