pl0stuff an optimizing pl0 > c transcompiler

[Nick B via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 17:59:15 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 04:37:44 UTC, Nick B wrote:
>> Would you know what is required to get good performance ?
>
> I can guess. However without actually implementing it my guess 
> is as good as any.
> I would probably look at HHVM, and see what is easy to 
> reimplement in D.

So the best approach, if I understand you correctly, would be to 
perform micro-benchmarks on new code that is either D code (with 
a variety of algorithms and/or vibe.d framework code) or HHVM 64 
bit code, and compare (and publish) the results ?