Beta D 2.069.0-b1

[Andrea Fontana via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 15:04:08 UTC, David Nadlinger 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 15:01:31 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> On Thursday, 8 October 2015 at 12:20:23 UTC, Andrea Fontana 
>> wrote:
>>> Are dmd 2.069b1 binaries compiled with dmd 2.069b1 or with 
>>> dmd 2.068.2?
>>
>> The last released compiler, we don't have any bootstrap method 
>> (using a small C++ compiler or so).
>
> One does not exclude the other. You could still re-build 
> 2.069b1 using itself.
>
>  — David

Sure, just to know which option is used.

I think rebuilding 2.069b1 with 2.069b1 could help to find bugs 
and, of course, can takes advantages from the new improvements... 
am I missing something?