Release D 2.072.0

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 11/11/16 8:21 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 04:54 AM, Kagamin wrote:
>> On Thursday, 10 November 2016 at 13:58:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
>> wrote:
>>> Only possibility is just to ignore ALL cycles, and print them if any
>>> are detected.
>>
>> Run the new detector and if it fails, run the old one, if it succeeds,
>> print a message.
>
> Or:
>
> Run the new dmd. If it fails, either fix your code or go temporarily go
> back to the old dmd until you can fix your code.
>

The option to ignore the cycles is there, added to allow for people to 
use the new DMD even if cycles exist. However, it is a runtime switch, 
which means you have to run it that way.

-Steve