Release D 2.072.0

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Friday, 11 November 2016 at 19:36:59 UTC, Nick Sabalausky 
wrote:
>
> I've gone through a lot of compiler upgrades on a lot of D 
> projects, and in my experience, this "investigate and fix for 
> the new dmd" has always been trivial (aside from one instance 
> where Phobos's standard function deprecation policy wasn't 
> followed).
>
> Some things should certainly have a smooth transition path 
> (like above, when replacing a Phobos function with a different 
> one), but really, not everything needs to be.
>

They've talked about an auto-checker for dub packages. I suspect 
that will go a long way to reducing regressions.