Formal review of DIP1002

[pineapple via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 11:37:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical 
> feature would need to be include qualitatively new 
> motivation/evidence of usefulness.
>
> Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale: 
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1002.md#review

There should be no need for me to repeat the arguments against 
the DIP process already made by others. I will be submitting no 
more DIPs or engaging in the process in any way unless and until 
it is significantly changed.