DIP 1003: remove `body` as a keyword
Piotrek via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Mon Nov 21 13:29:14 PST 2016
On Monday, 21 November 2016 at 20:59:32 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> How about this alternative ("in" and "out" blocks inside
>> function body):
>>
>> void foo(int a)
>> {
>> in
>> {
>> assert (a > 0);
>> }
>> out
>> {
>> (ret) assert(ret > 0);
>> }
>>
>> // body code
>>
>> return a;
>> }
>>
>>
>> or for one-liners:
>>
>> void foo(int a)
>> {
>> in assert (a > 0);
>> out (ret) assert(ret > 0);
>>
>> // body code
>>
>> return a;
>> }
>>
>> BR,
>> Piotrek
>
> Won't work. Contracts are part of the function signature.
> That's the point.
How does "auto" work? Can't the inner in&out be applied to the
signature?
BR,
Piotrek
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list