Beta 2.072.0-b1

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 2016-10-02 14:37, Martin Nowak wrote:

> Yes, that's how it should be, but don't both deprecations contain enough
> information to replace old code?

Yeah, I see that now. I didn't notice it at first. It's not as clear as 
I would like. I would like it to explicitly state "To this instead: ...".

I think it could be more clear why it's deprecated and what to do instead:

Language construct A is deprecated.

A is bad because: ...
Do this instead: ...

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg