Battle-plan for CTFE

[Stefam Koch via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Monday, 24 October 2016 at 06:37:12 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the feedback.


I have take care of the blocker for now.
I turns out my tests contained wrong code that reused a register 
for multiple purposes.
LLVM does not like that.
So it assumed the wrong things while optimising and went into the 
wrong direction makeing complete bogus out of valid code.