Getters/setters generator

[Eugene Wissner via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 07:06:05 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 January 2017 at 06:26:35 UTC, Eugene Wissner 
> wrote:
>> On Friday, 9 December 2016 at 18:53:55 UTC, Andrei 
>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>> Love it, and was toying with similar ideas too. One good 
>>> extension is to add a predicate to the setter, which guards 
>>> the assignment. -- Andrei
>>
>> What kind of predicate do you mean? Can you give an example 
>> please?
>
> setValue(uint _under24)
> {
> assert(_under24 < 24);
> under24 = _under24;
> }

Ah, well thanks. I don't think it makes much sense since it would 
be easier to write a complete setter if the user needs extra 
checks. Accessors are there only for the generation of the 
standard methods, that just get or set some object property.