Reorganization and list of D libraries (300+)

[rikki cattermole]

On 06/11/2017 4:59 PM, jmh530 wrote:
> On Monday, 6 November 2017 at 16:12:14 UTC, Martin Tschierschke wrote:
>>
>> Even being the wrong Martin :-) I think the DUB registry really needs 
>> more and better filters, so that the gems inside can be found easily. 
>> (like: Number of Github stars, number of downloads, number of 
>> developers and in the future: money donated to this project ...).
>>
>> There has been several attempts but I would like to encourage the D 
>> Foundation to put more focus on this. Better ecosystem around third 
>> party software means less work for improvement of standard lib.
>>
>> Regards mt.
> 
> Agreed. (IMO more important than Elvis operator)

+[something]

If the DIP is too complex or big, it will be getting a no from me.
I just don't see any of those extra syntaxes being discussed as useful.