DIP 1009 (Add Expression-Based Contract Syntax) Accepted

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Friday, 6 April 2018 at 16:57:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Now, if the contracts ended up in the documentation or something

My documentation generator supports contracts, but I found in 
practice, most of them are so illegible it doesn't actually help 
any to include them, so I never do.

But if they were simpler single expressions, it might make sense 
to revisit that.