DIP 1009 (Add Expression-Based Contract Syntax) Accepted

[H. S. Teoh]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:45:15PM +0000, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> What would have made contract trully powerful for me is them being
> emitted at caller side. This way if I use a release build of library
> but debugging my app I still get my stupidity guarded by contracts of
> the API. *
[...]

I say this should be the next step.  We should write up a DIP for this.


T

-- 
Creativity is not an excuse for sloppiness.