Enum and Function Parameters Attributes -- No DIP Required

[Ali]

On Thursday, 12 April 2018 at 08:28:17 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> * Changes to the language itself, such as syntax/semantics
> * Changes to the functional behavior of code generated by the 
> compiler
>
> This proposal is a removal of a limitation on an existing 
> feature -- it neither modifies existing syntax nor requires 
> deprecation of any other language features. Nor does it change 
> the behavior of generated code.

So if this change doesn't change anything, why is it called a 
change?

An addition is a type of change and you make it sound as if DIPs 
are only required for breaking changes

I think any change or addition (transparent, minor, simple) that 
add capabilities to the language or to the standard library 
should have been a DIP

If the process is too heavy for small changes, add a simple path 
in the process for small changes, instead of completely ignoring 
the process, add a fast track process for minor changes

Anyway, good luck, and happy to see D adding features :)