dxml 0.3.0 released

[Jesse Phillips]

On Friday, 20 April 2018 at 00:46:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:

> Yes. I would have thought that that was clear. It throws if any 
> of the characters or sequence of characters in the argument 
> aren't legal in the text portion of an XML document. Those 
> characters that can be legally present in encoded form but not 
> in their literal form can be encoded first with encodeText. 
> I'll try to make the documentation clearer.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

I think I just feel it is a little hidden under the exception 
list. A note in the general description about utilizing 
encodeText on text which needs encoding would be good.