Autowrap for .NET is Now Available

[Adam Wilson]

On 12/14/18 2:33 PM, Sjoerd Nijboer wrote:
> Is there any overhead on the generated interface? Or overhead the 
> compiler can't trivially optimise away.
> 

Yes, any overheads that would normally be associated with a P/Invoke 
call will be present here.

> Do you have any recocmendations about mixing coe like, don't use strings 
> for now or try to minimize switching from D to C# and vice-versa.
> 

Strings are fine. But definitely try to minimize switching as there is 
some pretty significant overheads on the D side with module 
constructors. And "switching" can happen in some pretty well hidden 
places, for example, appending to a range is switch.

> Do you have plans to incorportae this as a VisualD project .csproj 
> project since it's already intended to be microsoft oriented? (It would 
> seem like a good fit to me.) That way you could even take away the mixin 
> code and the "running the main method" code.
> 

I do not since I wouldn't know where to start, but it's possible.

> Does it work with LDC or only with DMD? How about GCC on linux?

It works with anything that can output a shared library and C interfaces. :)

-- 
Adam Wilson
IRC: EllipticBit
import quiet.dlang.dev;