TSV Utilities release with LTO and PGO enabled
Jon Degenhardt
jond at noreply.com
Thu Jan 18 01:49:05 UTC 2018
On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 at 21:49:52 UTC, Johan Engelen
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 at 04:37:04 UTC, Jon Degenhardt
> wrote:
>>
>> Clearly personal judgment played a role. However, the tools
>> are reasonably task focused, and I did take basic steps to
>> ensure the benchmark data and tests were separate from the
>> training data/tests. For these reasons, my confidence is good
>> that the results are reasonable and well founded.
>
> Great, thanks for the details, I agree.
> Hope it's useful for others to see these details.
Thanks Johan, much appreciated. :)
> (btw, did you also check the performance gains when using the
> profile of the benchmark itself, to learn about the upper-bound
> of PGO for your program?)
>
> I'll merge the IR PGO addition into LDC master soon. Don't know
> what difference it'll make.
No, I didn't do an upper-bounds check, that's a good idea. I plan
to test the IR based PGO when it's available, I'll run an
upper-bounds check as part of it.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list