On Monday, 4 June 2018 at 11:28:26 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
> Thought: Couldn't we have alternative names in the parameter
> instead? E.g.
> ```D
> void foo(int x/x0/width, int y/y0/height){}
> ```
This intuitively means that any combination of the parameter
names would work (e.g. (x, y0), (width, y)), which is not what we
want.