Encouraging preliminary results implementing memcpy in D

[errExit]

On Thursday, 14 June 2018 at 03:59:47 UTC, Cym13 wrote:
>
> Don't mistake spammer management with discrimination. I share 
> your frustration that TOR isn't more usable than it is today 
> with CloudFlare etc, but coming with political reasons holds no 
> water if the reason why it was blacklisted wasn't political in 
> the first place. It's not false, it just won't work.
>
> Hopefully once that particular user gets discouraged or we find 
> a way to actually avoid user impersonification, then things 
> will be able to come back to normal.

The D Foundation now subjects all users having an ip originating 
from a tor exit node, to having their posts moderated (but by 
whom, when, how, criteria ?? etc).

Literally millions of people could, and probably would, be using 
that exit node.

So that is plain discrimination. It's not spammer management.

Forcing people to identify themselves, is also not about spammer 
management either.

The D Foundation IS now discimantory against those that want that 
believe that freedom and privacy is some to be protected.

This becomes problematic for those of us who work in 'certain 
organisations', that insist on tracking it's employees online 
activities (even outside of the workplace).

It's a shame the D Foundation has finally succumed to the big 
brother mentality - under the guise of protecting you from spam.

https://blog.torproject.org/dont-let-facebook-or-any-tracker-follow-you-web