DIP 1018--The Copy Constructor--Formal Review
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.com
Mon Feb 25 20:19:17 UTC 2019
On 2/25/19 2:41 PM, bachmeier wrote:
> On Monday, 25 February 2019 at 19:24:55 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>
>> From the process document:
>>
>> “the DIP Manager or the Language Maintainers may allow for exceptions
>> which waive requirements or responsibilities at their discretion.”
>>
>> If you were to write a DIP for a feature they think important enough,
>> it could be fast tracked, too.
>
> I hate to be so negative, but when I see D's corporate management
> structure, the lack of community contribution is obvious. It doesn't
> exactly motivate contributions. This is no way to run an open source
> project. I understand that it works well for Facebook because everyone
> on the team is paid six figures, and they can be replaced in two hours,
> but an open source project is not Facebook.
>
> I know the whole argument about why it is that way. That doesn't mean
> it's going to work.
What do you recommend? Should we carry a final review here?
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list