DIP 1016--ref T accepts r-values--Formal Assessment

[Nicholas Wilson]

On Friday, 25 January 2019 at 11:56:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> It should never have gotten this far without giving a precise 
> explanation of how exception safety is achieved when faced with 
> multiple parameters.

The pot calling the kettle black. DIP1000? DIP1017?

Again, all that requires is a minor revision. It is not DIP 
breaking.