DIP 1016 should use expression lowering, not statement lowering
Nicholas Wilson
iamthewilsonator at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 31 03:03:39 UTC 2019
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 at 02:29:47 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
> I came up with this idea based on tempCString, but it doesn't
> work:
>
> So I don't get why it doesn't work. But if that was fixed,
> could be a potential workaround without requiring a DIP.
Thats nice! But it doesn't fix the problem that in generic code
you don't know without checking if you need to do that. Also the
template bloat.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list