On the D Blog: Lomuto's Comeback
kinke
noone at nowhere.com
Fri May 15 11:12:15 UTC 2020
On Friday, 15 May 2020 at 10:28:41 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> One curious question -- unless I've misread things horribly, it
> looks like the D benchmarks for Lomuto branch-free are
> consistently slower than for C++. Any idea why that is? I
> would expect gcc/gdc and clang/ldc to produce effectively
> identical results for code like this.
Wrt. the LDC results, LDC v1.17 was shipped with LLVM 8.0.1,
while the used clang is v10 based on LLVM 10, so that might
account for some slight diffs.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list