Release D 2.096.0

[Imperatorn]

On Sunday, 14 March 2021 at 07:15:57 UTC, Meta wrote:
> On Sunday, 14 March 2021 at 05:31:27 UTC, Max Haughton wrote:
>> On Sunday, 14 March 2021 at 03:25:28 UTC, starcanopy wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 13 March 2021 at 21:33:20 UTC, Meta wrote:
>>>
>>> It's pretty neat, but a DIP has to be drafted and approved 
>>> for it to be enabled by default, right? (Unless I missed it.)
>>
>> Correct. To be completely honest it shouldn't have ever been 
>> merged since there was no approval from WalTila and they steer 
>> the language.
>
> I raised a similar concern before with something else (don't 
> remember what it was), but apparently things can be merged 
> without W&A's approval if they're behind a switch (in the 
> opinion of at least some of the core maintainers, at least).

Yeah, iirc preview switches can be added without a DIP because 
it's not a part of the language per se. It's probably a 
reasonable approach, because otherwise you would get a multitude 
of forks instead.