Teaching D at a Russian University

[Paul Backus]

On Saturday, 19 February 2022 at 20:26:45 UTC, Elronnd wrote:
> On Saturday, 19 February 2022 at 17:33:07 UTC, matheus wrote:
>> By the way English isn't my first language but I think there 
>> is a small typo:
>>
>> "In D, such nuances are fewer, for header files are not 
>> required."
>>
>> I think it's missing the word "example":
>>
>> "In D, such nuances are fewer, for example header files are 
>> not required."
>
> I think it is fine as is.

Yes, this is a perfectly correct use of "for" as a coordinating 
conjunction. [1] It may come across as a bit formal or 
old-fashioned, though—in normal speech, you'd usually use "since".

[1] https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/grammarpunct/coordconj/