DIP1044---"Enum Type Inference"---Formal Assessment

[bachmeier]

On Wednesday, 26 April 2023 at 15:07:36 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:

> Again, all of this was covered and argumented during the DIP 
> discussion
>
> The goal is to improve the language, not find excuses or 
> workarounds, don't defend obfuscation, move forward

Your proposals were built on unrealistic examples and false 
dichotomies. If the only choice is 48-character informative names 
or two-character uninformative names, the problem is not the 
language.