dgretl: Initial release

[jmh530]

On Tuesday, 3 November 2026 at 22:14:53 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 November 2026 at 21:51:56 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> [snip]
> Another thing you get with an LLM port of this type of project 
> is extremely comprehensive testing. More than 100 potential 
> bugs were uncovered along the way. I would rather evaluate and 
> fix bugs in D than in C.
> [snip]

Yeah, I restarted some work on mir-stat recently and found a lot 
of bugs with AI, probably more in my code but a smaller number 
elsewhere. The top models are a better programmer than me at this 
point. Although still need guidance on some things.

If you’re interested, when I have some spare time, I could look 
in to adding a package to dgretl that would handle conversations 
between mir slices how matrices are handled in dgretl. There’s 
some overlap between dgretl and mir-stat, but I haven’t 
implemented everything that is in there (and not sure I will get 
to!). The main issue is that gretl uses column major and mir 
slices are row major.