Updates to compile-benchmark

[Shammah Chancellor]

On Monday, 5 October 2026 at 08:29:58 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 October 2026 at 02:26:20 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 29 September 2026 at 21:48:21 UTC, Per Nordlöw 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Am I reading this right: dmd has runtime of 5,36 for us/f, gdc 
>> has 125,46 and ldmd2 has 175,52. So ldc and gdc are slower 
>> than dmd?
>
> They always have been? Maybe you're confusing compilation speed 
> with the speed of the generated binary?

Am I reading the README correctly that the runtime of the d 
samples are also faster?

It also says that the build times of Cuik are faster, but from 
reading the table that's not what the table says?