DMD 0.164: Possible bug in order of evaluation

[Walter Bright]

Klaus Oberhofer wrote:
> While porting some C-Code to D I had a possible bug that has to do with 
> the order of evaluation of the post increment operator. 
> The following C sample
[...]
>     testarray_b[i++] = 1U << (16 - i);
[...]
> Could someone confirm this as a bug ?

In the source code, yes. Depending on order of evaluation of side 
effects is an error in D as well as an error in C and C++.