[Issue 655] Operator overload uses opIndex instead of opIndexAssign

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Wed Dec 6 06:43:26 PST 2006


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=655





------- Comment #1 from brunodomedeiros+bugz at gmail.com  2006-12-06 08:43 -------
Agh, read the comment above as:
  m[0] = 42; // uses opIndex instead of opIndexAssign, not ok according to spec


-- 




More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list