[Issue 691] New: Object.print ought to be removed or at least deprecated
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sat Dec 16 19:01:44 PST 2006
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=691
Summary: Object.print ought to be removed or at least deprecated
Product: D
Version: 0.177
Platform: All
URL: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/2558
6.html
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
AssignedTo: bugzilla at digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: smjg at iname.com
The Object class contains the method
void print();
Its flaw is that it gives the application using it no choice of what to output
to. Different applications, or even parts of the same application, may want to
output variously to stdout, stderr, a log file or a GUI window, just to name a
few possibilities.
And it serves no real purpose. If a program wants to output the string
representation of something, it can use .toString directly, which is much more
versatile.
While in theory print could be overridden e.g. to show more information than
would appear in the toString, this isn't the way to do it. Better would be for
individual classes that want to do this to define a function such as
toLongString. A class designer may also want to have the information output
piece by piece to avoid having to allocate enough memory to hold the whole
output at once - again, such a class would define its own print function.
Preferably one that takes an OutputStream parameter rather than having the
destination hard-coded as with the current Object.print.
I therefore agree with the proposals of various people that it should be got
rid of. Partly because of its lack of practical use, but mainly because of its
flaw. It should at least be deprecated ASAP. Removing it altogether would
require a recompile, but at least if this is done before 1.0 then it would save
having to recompile later.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list