[Issue 262] New: Missing DDoc comments in on Socket.blocking

[Mike Parker]

Chris Miller wrote:
> It looks like when Ddoc comments were added, the blocking documentation 
> was added to the wrong element (_blocking (Windows only) instead of 
> blocking() (there are 2 for get/set, one needs a ditto)). There also 
> seems to be other missing ddoc comments, such as SocketSet.max (which 
> should be documented in the old doc), and a few constructors (e.g. the 
> exceptions) do not show what the parameters are (simple /// by them 
> should be enough).

I really borked both bug reports I posted about the socket module. I 
didn't examine anything beyond the blocking property methods. I should 
have noticed all of that myself and included it.