Required to link windows header modules (?)
Sean Kelly
sean at f4.ca
Sun Jun 11 11:27:24 PDT 2006
Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:31:42 +1000, Bruno Medeiros
> <brunodomedeirosATgmail at SPAM.com> wrote:
>
>> Sean Kelly wrote:
>>> This would actually address a problem I noticed with Build in that
>>> it isn't able to detect if a module is a "header" module and will
>>> compile and link the code in anyway, which produces "previous
>>> definition different" errors at link time.
>>> Sean
>>
>> Hum, Have you used build exclusions (option -X) in order not to
>> compile and link a module?
>>
>
> I think that the best option for now is to use
>
> version(build) pragma(nolink);
>
> This will ensure that the file containing this pragma is not compiled or
> linked.
Yup. This is what I've been doing.
Sean
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list