stupid errors
    debugger 
    debugger_member at pathlink.com
       
    Mon Mar 20 16:44:29 PST 2006
    
    
  
Derek Parnell says...
>> this kind of bug is @!*$ and I am not interested in wasting my time
>I just tried this using dmd v.150 and Windows XP and it works fine.
Lucky you. But I am really not interested in wasting my time by working in a
buggy language nor by cutting my source down to the essential raising that bug.
In fact the control flow took even the wrong path:
switch( value){
case SOMECONST:
assert( false); // not executed
break;
case SOMEOTHERCONST:
assert( value == SOMEOTHERCONST); // failed
}
    
    
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list