[Bug 64] Unhandled errors should go to stderr
Don Clugston
dac at nospam.com.au
Thu Mar 23 02:55:18 PST 2006
d-bugmail at puremagic.com wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64
>
> ------- Comment #2 from smjg at iname.com 2006-03-23 04:22 -------
> Sorry, I was thinking of it as silent generation of bad code, which Walter once
> suggested should count as critical. Should've finished reading that discussion
> I guess....
Silent generation of bad code is a thousand times more serious than a
memory leak, or even a segfault (after all, it could potentially cause
segfaults in thousands of apps!). I really think the categories for a
compiler are fundamentally different from those for any other type of
application.
I'm not sure that this particular issue is bad code generation though.
And certainly not a P1. Since D is currently usable, a P1 can only apply
to a regression.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list