[Bug 73] Functions used to initialize variables are not inlined.

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73





------- Comment #2 from godaves at yahoo.com  2006-03-25 12:01 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> There's a comment in inline.c for DeclarationExp's saying:
> 
> // Should scan variable initializers
> 
> But it isn't happening right now.  Adding a basic scan of the ExpInitializer
> (if present) the same way DeclarationExp::inlineCost works seems to resolve
> this, but considering how trivial that is... I can't help but expect that
> there's more to it than just that.
> 

I've noticed that too and agree there must be more to it for some cases. But
couldn't that just be re-written by the compiler as two expressions and then
inlined?

int i = foo(); => int i; i = foo(); => doInline();

Are there cases where that wouldn't be semantically identical?

Thanks,
- Dave

> -[Unknown]


--