[Issue 297] New: Shadowing declarations allowed in foreach type lists

[Thomas Kuehne]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

d-bugmail at puremagic.com schrieb am 2006-08-20:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=297

> void main() {
>         int i;
>         int[] a;
>         foreach (i; a) {}
>         foreach (i, n; a) {}
>
>         // this fails, the above don't
>         for (int i;;) {}
> }
>
> I don't think this should be allowed, but I'm not entirely certain. Foreaches
> are, in a way, functions in their own right, passed to the container's opApply,
> and shadowing in nested functions or function/delegate literals _is_ allowed.
>
> I just still tend to think of foreach loops as only the better way of writing
> for loops, and since you can't do it with for loops you shouldn't be able to do
> it with it foreach loops. <g>

Added to DStress as
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/f/foreach_37_A.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/f/foreach_37_B.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/f/foreach_37_C.d
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/f/foreach_37_D.d

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFINYhLK5blCcjpWoRAn3vAJ9i9VvntyfjLU3yDDpaCeqlU5ZA8gCePKZ5
xiQ4maye+EgY+rZgVOL8k+A=
=nr+N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----