[Issue 471] New: Protection attributes of mixin instances are applied in a wrong scope.

[Ary Manzana]

d-bugmail at puremagic.com escribió:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=471
> 
>            Summary: Protection attributes of mixin instances are applied in
>                     a wrong scope.
>            Product: D
>            Version: 0.173
>           Platform: PC
>         OS/Version: Windows
>             Status: NEW
>           Keywords: rejects-valid, spec
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P4
>          Component: DMD
>         AssignedTo: bugzilla at digitalmars.com
>         ReportedBy: brunodomedeiros+bugz at gmail.com
> 
> 
> Protection attributes of mixin instances are applied in a wrong scope.
> The following illustrates it:
> ---- baz.d ----
> module baz;
> 
> template Baz() {
>     private void privfunc(){ }
> }
> ---- ----
> import baz;
> 
> class Foo {
>     mixin Baz!();  
> 
>     void testfunc() {
>         privfunc(); // Error: .privfunc is private
>     }
> }
> ---- ----
> For reference the spec states (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/mixin.html):
> "Unlike a template instantiation, a template mixin's body is evaluated within
> the scope where the mixin appears, not where the template declaration is
> defined. It is analogous to cutting and pasting the body of the template into
> the location of the mixin."
> If the current compiler behavior is the intended behavior then fix the spec.
> 
> 

This is what I was talking about in the "Is a template like copy-paste" 
thread. Actually I was referring to copy-paste made by mixins.

Are the specs wrong?