[Issue 951] New: Missing line number: no constructor provided for a class derived from a class with no default constructor
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Feb 11 18:13:12 PST 2007
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=951
Summary: Missing line number: no constructor provided for a class
derived from a class with no default constructor
Product: D
Version: 1.005
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: bugzilla at digitalmars.com
ReportedBy: smjg at iname.com
----------
class Base {
this(int x) {}
}
class Derived : Base {}
----------
mln_no_def_this.d: constructor mln_no_def_this.Derived.this no match for
implicit super() call in constructor
----------
Presumably, DMD tries to find a line number for the implicit default
constructor in Derived, but can't find one and so doesn't give one. If a
constructor without a super call is supplied, then the same error occurs but
with a line number.
When no constructor has been defined, it should give an appropriate line
number, such as the line on which the class definition begins. And perhaps a
slightly different error message
mln_no_def_this.d(5): class mln_no_def_this.Derived no match for implicit
super() call in implicit default constructor
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list