[Issue 2060] some ddoc design typos

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2060





------- Comment #2 from ericanderton at yahoo.com  2008-04-30 16:16 -------
(In reply to comment #0)

I just posted a request for comments and proposals on the DNG.  In short, the
use of DDOC need to be much more semantic, and generated DDOC output should
never be passed back to the doc engine as raw output.  While this will increase
the complexity of the typical .ddoc script, as well as require several new
standard macros, the result will be richer output.  This will also open the
door for XML-based documentation, which is a handy way to move beyond DDOC's
limitations.

http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=70806


--