The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

October 2008 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Oct 1 03:28:19 PDT 2008
Ending: Fri Oct 31 15:19:09 PDT 2008
Messages: 225

• [Issue 2381] Minor mistakes in DDoc comments of std.path.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2381] Minor mistakes in DDoc comments of std.path.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2382] New: spec is not clear on what is allowed as global/static initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2383] New: default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2383] default arguments can implicitly access private global variables that are not visible at call site   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2384] New: abi spec is unclear on parameter passing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2384] abi spec is unclear on parameter passing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2378] Win32 OPTLINK crashes when it links some kind of static library into a executeable.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2381] Minor mistakes in DDoc comments of std.path.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2379] CTFE fails unless it is very straightforward   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2385] New: spec says all structs are returned via hidden pointer on linux, but it uses registers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2385] spec says all structs are returned via hidden pointer on linux, but it uses registers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2378] Win32 OPTLINK crashes when it links some kind of static library into a executeable.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2386] New: Array of forward referenced struct doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2377] ICE with wrong return type for templated method: template.c:784   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 929] Resizing array of associative arrays (uint[char[]][]) causes infinite loop / hang   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2375] Error using invariant array initializers with indexed elements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer is not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer is not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2387] New: Static array terminology   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2162] Access violation when threads run closures   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2388] New: type of NaN given by real.nan not specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2388] type of NaN given by real.nan not specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2388] type of NaN given by real.nan not specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer is not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2389] New: void* vs. object type overloading fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null giving bad error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2389] void* vs. object type overloading fails for null giving bad error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2390] New: Missing warning on conversion from int to char   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2390] Missing warning on conversion from int to char   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2376] CTFE fails on array literal of array literals of chars   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2391] New: Character array literals are not recognized as string literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2391] Character array literals are not recognized as string literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2376] CTFE fails on array literal of array literals of chars   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2374] (exp).Fn() fail assuming that exp is a type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2374] (exp).Fn() fail assuming that exp is a type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2392] New: Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration and function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2392] Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration and function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2392] Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration and function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2369] is(T == function) does not recognize function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2393] New: IFTI regression on (T:char)(T[]) vs (T:dchar)(T[])   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2369] is(T == function) does not recognize function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
  • No subject  
• [Issue 2366] Const member function syntax is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2394] New: IFTI fails for nulls   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2395] New: spec does not document struct forward declarations (declaring opaque struct type)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2395] spec does not document struct forward declarations (declaring opaque struct type)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2396] New: -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of large array of structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2396] -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of large array of structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2396] -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of large array of structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2396] -O causes very long execution time on foreach loop of large array of structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2397] New: wrong file name in error after #line   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2398] New: writef("%x") for a pointer is always uppercase   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1635] DirEntry.isfile() and DirEntry.isdir() broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2399] New: ICE on casting function to delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2400] New: return const proposals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2400] return const proposals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2094] transitive const can be broken easily   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2401] New: type definition conflicts with itself imported through different module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2402] New: Type is not found if accessed via renamed import   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2403] New: Ice on function pointer type forward declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2403] Ice on function pointer type forward declaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2405] New: std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2405] std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2405] std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2406] New: Declarator2 definition error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2407] New: function pointer as an enum's base type doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2408] New: class declared as invariant cannot have static methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2409] New: property is not called   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2410] New: array's invariant storage class dropped by a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2411] New: Reference Tuple Foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2412] New: Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2412] Hole in type system: array conversion to supertypes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2364] ftell return type is long in C, that is 64-bit on x86-64   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2095] covariance w/o typechecks = bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2413] New: getche differs from getch unexpectedly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2036] Hiding rules too restrictive   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2036] Hiding rules too restrictive   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2306] Scope for dynamic arrays should free memory.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2331] Enum hashes many times slower than normal hashes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2414] New: enum is dynamically evaluated, yum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2414] enum is dynamically evaluated, yum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2414] New: enum is dynamically evaluated, yum   Bruno Medeiros
  • [Issue 2415] New: DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition   Don
    • [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2415] DMD allows void foo(int i, ); function definition   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2257] Template value parameters behave like alias parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2416] New: Slice of typedef'ed array should preserve the typedef'ed type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2416] Slice of typedef'ed array should preserve the typedef'ed type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2416] Slice of typedef'ed array should preserve the typedef'ed type   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2417] New: protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2417] protected base member is not available via base hanlde in a derived class if it is defined in a separate module   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2418] New: Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten (unlike array literals)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten (unlike array literals)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten (unlike array literals)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten (unlike array literals)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten (unlike array literals)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten (unlike array literals)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2418] Same-value string (char[]) literals get overwritten (unlike array literals)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• Thread.getThis()   John C
  • Thread.getThis()   Denis Koroskin
    • [Issue 2419] New: Thread.getThis() broken?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   Sergey Gromov
• [Issue 2370] Version statement enhancement: versioned identifiers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2420] New: mixins are not considered in ddoc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2420] mixins are not considered in ddoc   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2422] New: Type is turned into type tuple in variadic template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning   Don
    • [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning   Lars Ivar Igesund
    • [Issue 2423] New: Erroneous unreachable statement warning   Lars Ivar Igesund
    • [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2423] Erroneous unreachable statement warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2424] New: std.functional binaryRevertArgs : "revert" should be "reverse"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1229] Linker fills disk   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2340] Template properties don't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2368] Calling a function with an address of another function, then calling a returned object is rejected   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2373] freebsd select does not accept values > 999,999   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2376] CTFE fails on array literal of array literals of chars   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2380] static struct initializer accepted as non static initializer is not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2365] compilation error: static const array in struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2344] Two wrong lookups for array functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2345] Return by reference should be allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2332] Initializing const or invariant hashes croaks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2333] Hash initializer does not work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2336] link to nonexistent std_array.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2341] Double destruction without intervening copy   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2362] Confusing description of 'aliasing of invariant with mutable'?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2366] Const member function syntax is missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2363] Spurious () required after function name when used with array in prefix form   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2404] std.gc.fullCollect hangs with multiple threads.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2425] New: second "interface" should be invariant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2425] second "interface" should be invariant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1645] can override base class' const method with non-const method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 929] Resizing array of associative arrays (uint[char[]][]) causes infinite loop / hang   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2426] New: Assertion failure: 'type' on line 6308 in file 'expression.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2426] New: Assertion failure: 'type' on line 6308 in file 'expression.c'   ore-sama
• [Issue 2320] ABI spec has contradictory information   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2427] New: Function call in struct initializer fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2427] Function call in struct initializer fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2427] Function call in struct initializer fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2427] Function call in struct initializer fails to compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2428] New: Accessing item in enum'd array produced compiler error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2429] New: std.stream.File incorrect flag parsing and sharing mode   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1986] Mixin code from website doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1727] Associate Array Literals regression   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2017] Dynamic array creation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2351] enum with no members allowed   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2430] New: Internal error: ..\ztc\evalu8.c 2093   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2431] New: Internal error: ../ztc/cgcod.c 1031 when using -O   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)   Charles Hixson
  • dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)   ore-sama
  • dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)   Steven Schveighoffer
  • dmd.conf problems on dmd.2.019 (object.d not readable)   BCS
    • [Issue 2432] New: complex alias -> mtype.c:125: virtual Type* Type::syntaxCopy(): Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 2432] complex alias -> mtype.c:125: virtual Type* Type::syntaxCopy(): Assertion `0' failed.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2336] link to nonexistent std_array.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2433] New: Assertion failure: 't->deco' on line 604 in file 'mtype.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2434] New: Compiler generates code that does not pass with -w for some array operations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 2435] New: Assertion failure: 'i < parameters->dim' on line 784 in file 'template.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• Bug using dynamicaly loaded function ?   Vermi
  • Bug using dynamicaly loaded function ?   Vermi
    • [Issue 2436] New: Unexpected OPTLINK termination   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 2436] Unexpected OPTLINK termination   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
      • [Issue 2436] Unexpected OPTLINK termination   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 2437] New: ICE - Assertion failure: default struct argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Fri Oct 31 15:19:09 PDT 2008
Archived on: Fri Oct 31 15:20:03 PDT 2008

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...