[Issue 2177] dstress nocompile section get something should be in compile section?

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2177


kamm-removethis at incasoftware.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Comment #1 from kamm-removethis at incasoftware.de  2008-09-09 10:48 -------
No, I believe most of these contain real nocompile test cases:

> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_cgcs_354_A.d
> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_cgcs_354_B.d

Borderline case. casts really aren't specified well enough.

> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_cod1_1656_B.d
> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_cod1_1656_H.d

Not sure, I have a feeling the short-circuiting shouldn't circumvent checking
the semantics...

> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_tocsym_142_A.d
> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_tocsym_142_B.d
> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_tocsym_142_C.d
> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_tocsym_142_D.d

Static function can't access this.member.

> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_tocsym_142_E.d

S is not an instance.

> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_toir_170_A.d
> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_toir_170_B.d

Static function can't create nested class.

> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_type_308_G.d
> kuehne\nocompile\b\bug_type_308_H.d

foo is not a static function.


--