[Issue 2347] opIs is missing

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2347


smjg at iname.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |smjg at iname.com




------- Comment #1 from smjg at iname.com  2008-09-09 16:56 -------
I think that having opIs is philosophically wrong.  The whole point of is is to
override any type-defined equality operator by forcing a byte-for-byte
comparison.  There are probably plenty of template libraries and the like that
rely on this.

What are these "user-defined smart references", anyway?


--