[Issue 808] using properties as lvalues
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Apr 2 06:49:36 PDT 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=808
------- Comment #1 from baryluk at smp.if.uj.edu.pl 2009-04-02 08:49 -------
Assigment to properties is actually call to some method which actually do other
operations (like reallocation). I think that
p op= x,
properties operations should be defined as
p = p op x
Also for user defined properties (if both setter and getter is availble, so
"lvalue-like" behaviour can be emulated in this way). Cases in which p += x,
should be performed differently can always be emulated by using wrapper
struct/class, which caries state and overloads opAddAssign. This cases are
rear, but still possible. (usefull for some highly optimized codes, or
synchronized/atomic changes, or loging actuall changes)
array.length *= 2; is one of the most annoying :)
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list