[Issue 2196] Link errors with an abstract class's method implementing an interface
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Apr 23 06:22:17 PDT 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2196
diggory.hardy at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
------- Comment #3 from diggory.hardy at gmail.com 2009-04-23 08:22 -------
Agreed.
I think what I was unsure on is why the linker wanted the definitions of an
abstract class that wasn't (attempted to be) used. But of course having to
explicitly mark such functions as abstract does make it clear whether or not
the function was intended to be defined in that class.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list