[Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented

d-bugmail at puremagic.com d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Apr 24 05:19:25 PDT 2009


http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302





------- Comment #9 from clugdbug at yahoo.com.au  2009-04-24 07:19 -------
Here's the link to Stewart's original post.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/31595.html

Note that Walter seems to have rejected Stewart's 3rd point, which is part of
the reason I don't think this is a spec bug rather than wrong-code... it's not
clear to me that we know what the correct code is.

The task should be separated into dependent bugs. Stewart's first point should
become a new Phobos bug -- it's something Sean can fix if it still applies.


-- 



More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs mailing list