[Issue 302] in/out contract inheritance yet to be implemented
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Fri Apr 24 05:19:25 PDT 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=302
------- Comment #9 from clugdbug at yahoo.com.au 2009-04-24 07:19 -------
Here's the link to Stewart's original post.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/31595.html
Note that Walter seems to have rejected Stewart's 3rd point, which is part of
the reason I don't think this is a spec bug rather than wrong-code... it's not
clear to me that we know what the correct code is.
The task should be separated into dependent bugs. Stewart's first point should
become a new Phobos bug -- it's something Sean can fix if it still applies.
--
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list