[Issue 3125] statement foreach semantic opApply should be tried if range funcs not satisfied
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Thu Jul 2 20:37:28 PDT 2009
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3125
Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jarrett.billingsley at gmail.c
| |om
--- Comment #5 from Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley at gmail.com> 2009-07-02 20:37:27 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here it is:
>
> class c
> {
> int head()
> {
> return 0;
> }
> int opApply(int delegate(ref int x) dg)
> {
> int i;
> i=3;
> dg(i);
> return 1;
> }
> }
>
> void main()
> {
> c c;
> c= new c;
> foreach(m;c)
> {
> assert(m==3);
> }
> }
You fail it. The error from this code is not related to the reported bug at
all. The lines
> c c;
> c= new c;
are illegal. If you change it to
> c c = new c;
it works fine in 2.029.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list