[Issue 2922] Egregiously bad hashing performance with strings

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2922



--- Comment #4 from David Simcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> 2009-11-06 08:22:04 PST ---
Fixed again (I think) 2.036.  Not sure why it's not in the changelog, but
running the test program in 2.036 gives good results.  I guess this bug is
closable, but I'll have to look at the druntime checkins in more detail b/c it
appears that, while string hashing is as good as it ever was, const(char)[]
hashing has improved so much that it's now better than string hashing.  I have
no idea why they don't just use the same function.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------