[Issue 4734] immutable return type specifier without parantheses confuses the compiler

[d-bugmail at puremagic.com]

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4734


Stephan Dilly <spam at extrawurst.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement


--- Comment #4 from Stephan Dilly <spam at extrawurst.org> 2010-08-26 15:16:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > You are absolutely right. I forgot about the ability to make functions
> > themselves const/immutable. It would really help if that right-side rule was in
> > place, because all this will do right now is cause confusion (unless we get a
> > nicer error message, in which case we can keep the flexibility I think..).
> > 
> > So maybe I should change this to an enhancement request for a better error
> > message.
> 
> it is nothing but consistent and should stay as it is.

sorry i should have read to the end. i aggree that the error message could be
improved ;)

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------