[Issue 4325] invariant syntax isn't strict
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
d-bugmail at puremagic.com
Sun Aug 29 20:01:51 PDT 2010
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4325
Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> 2010-08-29 20:01:39 PDT ---
The compiler will still print an error if you add any statements below a class
invariant, e.g.:
struct Foo {
invariant {}
}
struct Bar {
int x = 5;
invariant
assert(x == 1);
}
class CFoo {
invariant {}
}
class CBar {
invariant
}
void main()
{
Bar bar;
}
bug4325.d(7): Declaration expected, not 'assert'
So it might not be that bad. The same thing happens if you put "const" "pure"
"immutable" without any opening braces or colons, e.g.:
struct Foo {
pure
}
struct Bar {
const
}
class CFoo {
immutable
}
class CBar {
invariant
}
void main()
{
}
Compiles fine.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
More information about the Digitalmars-d-bugs
mailing list